In a massive unpleasant surprise for conservatives, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to avoid hearing a critical free speech appeal highlighting a growing threat to conservative values and the foundation of liberty.
See the tweet below!
A Massachusetts student, barred from wearing a “There are only two genders” T-shirt, represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing battle against school censorship of students who hold traditional views.
In a case that speaks volumes about our current cultural climate, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal from a young student in Middleborough, Massachusetts.
This 12-year-old found himself at the center of controversy for simply wearing a T-shirt stating there are only two genders.
The lower court’s decision to uphold the school’s ban stems from concerns that the message might harm transgender students, underscoring the fine line between free expression and educational policies.
A federal court supported the school’s decision to prohibit the T-shirt, arguing it negatively impacted transgender and gender-nonconforming students.
Yet, dissenting justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas believed the case was crucial, emphasizing that censoring such viewpoints threatens free speech rights, especially when schools allow messages supporting multiple genders.
“This case presents an issue of great importance for our Nation’s youth: whether public schools may suppress student speech either because it expresses a viewpoint that the school disfavors or because of vague concerns about the likely effect of the speech on the school atmosphere or on students who find the speech offensive,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito, cited by ABC News.
The family of the student, Liam Morrison, pursued the case alongside the Alliance Defending Freedom and the Massachusetts Family Institute, arguing that the school’s ban violated his First Amendment rights.
Despite attempts to accommodate by altering the shirt to read “There are [censored] genders,” the school persisted in its prohibition, claiming safety concerns among students.
Justice Alito noted a disturbing double standard: the school permitted pro-multiple gender messaging while suppressing opposing views.
Such actions challenge the principles of free speech, raising questions about whether discomfort is enough to justify suppression of ideas.
Liam, who maintained his shirt was an opinion rather than targeted hate speech, was still sent home for his stance.
My problem with SCOTUS declining to hear the LIAM MORRISON case is the school was overt in propagandizing LGBTQ Yuck and rapical gender and transgender ideology. Students do not have a right to wear whatever they want, but if the school is one sidedly advocating a particular… pic.twitter.com/B72thtrhVC
— The Raven's Call (@astheravencalls) May 27, 2025
Alito further warned that educational institutions should not wield their power to squelch free expression.
There is a looming concern that vague notions of disruption could be misused, silencing conservative voices and distorting the educational atmosphere.
The Supreme Court’s inaction is a wake-up call for American patriots who cherish constitutional freedoms.
