Marking a massive shift in U.S. environmental policy, the Trump administration plans to carry out a complete overhaul of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Specifically, the changes within the agency will result in the elimination of the Energy Star program.
It has been a cornerstone of energy efficiency for over 30 years, so its removal signals substantial reorganization within the EPA.
Some argue this is a necessary cost-saving measure, while others express concern over its implications for consumers and the environment.
The EPA intends to eliminate the Energy Star program as part of a more comprehensive agency restructuring.
EPA Office of Atmospheric Protection director Paul Gunning confirmed the de-prioritization and the program’s elimination.
Since its creation in 1992, the Energy Star label has become a trusted symbol for consumers looking to reduce energy consumption and lower utility bills.
Recognizable by its blue logo, Energy Star has enforced federal energy efficiency standards across home appliances like dishwashers and refrigerators.
The decision is part of a broader reorganization plan that includes eliminating divisions overseeing climate change and energy efficiency.
The program’s end raises concerns about decreased product functionality and increased costs.
Nearly three dozen trade groups and companies, including the Chamber of Commerce, have urged the EPA to reconsider.
Energy Star’s impact on consumer behavior and manufacturing practices is notable.
The program saved households and businesses over $500 billion in energy costs and prevented four billion metric tons of greenhouse gases. It has also resulted in reduced power usage and pollution.
Since 1992, Energy Star has expanded to cover various products, from appliances to buildings, requiring strict energy performance standards.
Despite its voluntary nature, it became instrumental in guiding consumers toward energy-efficient choices.
Some industry leaders express alarm over its elimination, citing potential negative consequences for consumer.
The EPA’s reorganization involves dissolving the Office of Atmospheric Protection and the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Although the EPA refrained from commenting specifically on Energy Star, it emphasized improvements to the agency’s structure in line with its core mission.
Critics, including Democrat Senator Jeanne Shaheen (NH), argue that terminating Energy Star could inflate costs for households and businesses, favoring billionaires and utilities.
However, proponents of the reorganization believe streamlining operations will enhance efficiency.
Despite fears of decreased functionality and increased costs, the EPA maintains that the reorganization will ultimately advance the agency’s objectives.
